Evan Stevens
CEE has been getting a bad rap lately thanks to HIIT. Passé and the old way of doing things, it isn’t as well liked as the new, hip, HIIT protocols. However, CEE does have some things to offer on its own. For starters, it is much easier and more accessible to more people. It may require more time but you do not have to work nearly as hard. The physiological benefits you see from HIIT can be seen in CEE but at effort levels almost half as strenuous as HIIT. Whereas in HIIT you must be going at 90-95% VO2max, you can see the same effects at 50-60% VO2max. You just have to go for twice as long.
Cycling
While there were similarities in terms of health benefits (VO2max, Peak Power Output), over the eight-week study participants who were in the CEE group were significantly more likely to stick with the training through the course as well as after the study than either HIIT groups. This study does have some areas of contention, namely that it falls victim to the troubles of defining HIIT and CEE. 20 minutes at 90% VO2max is a higher intensity than what a lot of other studies quantify as being CEE and for a much shorter time period. That said, as an entire body or work, it was still more palatable than either method of HIIT described here simply because it wasn’t nearly as taxing.
Looking for a high performance pedal? Check out Pedaling Innovations’ Catalyst Pedals.
The Case for CEE
CEE also burns fat more readily than HIIT. While HIIT can cause fat to be stored in the muscles, this really only happens in highly trained individuals. Working out at high intensities diverts blood away from fat stores and towards working muscles where oxygenated and glycogen-rich blood is needed. At lower intensities, 50-60% VO2max, blood was still flowing to where fat is stored and could thus be burned more readily as a source of fuel.
Looking to boost the effectiveness of your CEE workouts? Supplement with this protein powder for great results:
Related Article: Keep Moving – Aerobic Exercise Increases College GPAs
As we get fitter, we can preferentially burn fat. However, if we cannot get to the fat stores because our blood is going to our muscles instead of our fat stores, it is a redundant system. This is the reason why highly trained individuals are able to store fat within their muscles so that they can access it more readily. Overall, continuous exercise at lower intensity is better for those looking to get rid of a little extra fat during their initial training phases. In the long term, this becomes less of an issue.
One other thing to consider with CEE: the heart rate is more controlled, the left ventricle has more time to fully fill. At very high intensities, the heart is beating at such a rapid rate that it cannot completely refill between contractions and less blood is pumped as a result. At lower intensities the heart does just the opposite, filling more and pumping more blood with each contraction, which strengthens the heart. Over time, this can cause a lowered heart rate both at rest and during exercise, a unique adaptation to continuous exercise.
“Afterburn”
However, HIIT offers one more trick up its sleeve that sets it apart from CEE and is a major reason why it is quickly growing as a leading exercise protocol. Following strenuous exercise, there is a period of increased oxygen intake. Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption (EPOC or “afterburn”) is the phenomena post exercise where there is a drive to intake more oxygen, once believed to be because of “oxygen debt,” and was thought to exist to clear lactate built up because of strenuous exercise.
Takeaway:
Recent studies have shown that EPOC has nothing to do with lactic acid metabolism. EPOC is instead used to restore and adapt the body from the training session. This system restores energy to the body, producing ATP and increases metabolism in response to the increased body temperature from exercising which results in an increased consumption of fuel – fats are broken down with the resulting free fatty acids being dumped into the blood where they are circulated to replenish energy.
In this way, HIIT can rival the level of fat oxidation seen in CEE and has been shown to actually increase the effect of fat burning past lower CEE. EPOC is also improved with increased intensity and duration: the harder you work and the longer you work, the greater the afterburn effect provided by EPOC. This effect can last for up to as much as 38 hours post-exercise bout, but the largest effect occurring within the first three hours, increasing the metabolic rate by up to 13%. EPOC values were one area where metabolic factors were significantly increased over CEE.
Related Articles:
Why HIIT Excels – Intervals Vs Endurance (Part 3)
Why Is HIIT Different? – Intervals Vs Endurance (Part 2)
Clash of The Titans – Intervals vs Endurance (Part 1)
You Might Like: